It’s amazing what you can get if you show a bit of interest. Simon Harriyott had spoken with the guys at Flickr about their brilliant ‘machinetags’ service in connection with our http://openplaques.org/ project and now we have an official Flickr machinetag. Read about it on the Flickr Dev blog.
What this means is that if any photos of plaques are given a Creative Commons license and tagged with an openplaques id in the format “openplaques:id=<id>” then a link to the openplaques.org record will appear on the Flickr site itself with the wording from the inscription.
In turn, the tagged photo on Flickr will then be displayed on the corresponding plaque page on our website! It can take up to 24 hours before the image appears on our site, so don’t panic if you don’t see it instantly.
The image below is an example of a photo on Flickr.
The image below is of the Tags section for that photo on Flickr. It shows the machinetag “openplaques:id=975″ and a link that gets generated on the Flickr site “This is an Open Plaques site: Immediately to the south of this building….”
The machinetag enables our openplaques server to directly identify photographed plaques and pull in any metadata such as the geographical position (if it’s been placed on a Flickr map).
We are of course immensely proud to be one of only half a dozen sites to have an official Flickr machinetag. As Simon said when I blogged about this on my own blog, “If you don’t ask, you don’t get!”.
Pingback: Open Plaques Blog – Open Plaques selected for RSA Catalyst support
In fact it works better than your link going the other way
my picture at http://www.flickr.com/photos/tim_ellis/1351044509/ has had the openplaques:id=1374 tag for months (possibly more than a year) – while Flickr has spotted it and provided the text from the openplaques site, the openplaques site still says there is no photo…
It’s strange, the openplaques Flickr processor has picked up 23 of your images http://www.openplaques.org/photographers/tim%20ellis but not that one. There must be a subtle error in there somewhere, we will continue to investigate.
It’s interesting if you follow the photographers link you give that some of the photos are listed by plaque no, and some by name of the person – which I guess must be something to do with how they are held in your database…
Yes, the links depend on whether we have managed to parse the plaque inscription yet and link it to a ‘person’ record. If we can’t do this automatically it needs a little bit of curating to get it correct. Over time we are building up a cross-referenced db of people, roles, dates and places.